Research
Competitors, SERP intent, keyword map, monetization opportunities.
Paperclip company operating system
Paperclip should not depend on a CEO agent remembering every task. Use a durable workflow driver, strict stage gates, and validation checklists so each website moves from research to launch without missing legal, security, design, or QA requirements.
The current bottleneck
A single broad CEO task can skip steps, duplicate work, or forget critical pieces like footer links, cookie/legal pages, security checks, analytics, or QA. The CEO should manage exceptions, not invent the production process every time.
Recommended architecture
The workflow driver is deterministic. Paperclip is the control plane. Agents execute scoped issues. Humans approve risky decisions.
n8n first, Temporal/custom runner later. Stores the state machine, retries, stage order, and gates.
Creates issues, assigns agents, tracks comments, approvals, costs, heartbeats, and audit history.
Agents produce artifacts. Humans resolve secrets, billing, legal approvals, final deploy, and ambiguous blockers.
Niche site launch workflow
Each stage creates a Paperclip issue with an assigned agent, required artifact, acceptance checklist, timeout, retry policy, and next-stage rule.
Competitors, SERP intent, keyword map, monetization opportunities.
Sitemap, positioning, page priorities, feature scope, success metrics.
Briefs, copy, FAQs, trust sections, legal-sensitive claims review.
Header, footer, navigation, responsive layout, components, brand system.
Implementation, data integrations, auth/payments if required, SEO metadata.
Privacy, imprint/contact, cookie consent, footer links, regional requirements.
GA4/GSC, events, conversion funnels, robots/sitemap, tracking validation.
Mobile/desktop, browser checks, Lighthouse, forms, links, screenshots.
Cloudflare deploy, DNS, smoke tests, rollback notes, final approval.
Post-launch SEO audit, conversion fixes, content expansion, monitoring.
Failure tolerance
Use idempotency keys per domain and stage. Retry transient failures with exponential backoff, never duplicate issues.
launch:{domain}:stage:research
A task is not complete because an agent says so. It passes only when required artifacts and checklists are present.
done + artifact + gate = next stage
After max attempts, create a human review issue with failure reason, links, logs, and exact decision needed.
3 failures → human_review
Source of truth
The durable playbook should live in GitHub, while n8n or a custom runner reads it. CEO/PM agents supervise exceptions and make decisions, but the workflow itself stays deterministic and auditable.
Example required gates
Header, footer, mobile nav, CTA, trust section, responsive screenshots.
Titles, descriptions, canonical tags, sitemap, robots, internal links.
Privacy, imprint/contact, cookie handling, footer legal links.
Secrets, headers, auth/payment checks, no exposed tokens.
Build passes, links/forms work, mobile and desktop screenshots attached.
Cloudflare build, smoke test, DNS verified, rollback notes written.